|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
95
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now?
1) Yes 2) Why are you mining? 3) Why not move to a different system 4) If he follows you report him for harrasment.
You're welcome |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
95
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:Repeatedly bumping someone who is mining to keep them from mining and demanding a ransom to stop the bumping is not an accident.... it would be termed more as a form of in game extortion.
Miners have no ability to retaliate in .9 or 1.0 space against someone who repeatedly follows them from belt to belt for hours constantly bumping them off their asteroids.
I did pack up and move about 16 jumps out and hopefully that will solve the problem for a while.
Repeatedly bumping someone for an hour and chasing them through all the belts in a system with the sole purpose of keeping them from enjoying what they pay money to do is nothing but harassment plain and simple. Demanding a ransom to stop the activity should be a should be considered as proof that it is not "accidental" and should be a bannable offense considering there is a chat log of the conversation.
I seriously doubt at this point I will renew either of my accounts once my 6 months expires at this point and will focus instead on Elder Scrolls Online in a few months.
Mining is what attracted me to this game, its peaceful and quiet and I enjoy doing it.
Maybe you missed the part where if he's following you that you can petition CCP on grounds of harrassment as you astutely noted it is :) |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
99
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Rick II Egnald wrote:Repeatedly bumping someone who is mining to keep them from mining and demanding a ransom to stop the bumping is not an accident.... it would be termed more as a form of in game extortion.
Miners have no ability to retaliate in .9 or 1.0 space against someone who repeatedly follows them from belt to belt for hours constantly bumping them off their asteroids.
I did pack up and move about 16 jumps out and hopefully that will solve the problem for a while.
Repeatedly bumping someone for an hour and chasing them through all the belts in a system with the sole purpose of keeping them from enjoying what they pay money to do is nothing but harassment plain and simple. Demanding a ransom to stop the activity should be a should be considered as proof that it is not "accidental" and should be a bannable offense considering there is a chat log of the conversation.
I seriously doubt at this point I will renew either of my accounts once my 6 months expires at this point and will focus instead on Elder Scrolls Online in a few months.
Mining is what attracted me to this game, its peaceful and quiet and I enjoy doing it. Can't blame ya man. EVE is still a joke with regards on how it deals with high sec "pirates". Maybe CCP will pull their head out of their ass one day.
Big Fat NOOPEEE.
CCP doesn't play this game for us, it gives us the tools to do everything ourselves. It's your choice to use them or not. Don't complain about things you didn't do, only things that you couldn't.
Example: probing down a titan and bumping it during E-Warp
Players use skills in fitting ships, scanning and organisation to destroy a titan ((albeit later being declared an exploit) This was changed because the Titan pilot had no way to respond to the situation with systems disabled in E-Warp.)
Miner sucking rocks is bumped out of range,
CCP does nothing. Miner cries on forums. CCP still does nothing.
Let us analyze the differences, Miner could move to new system/space/area, Join a player corp and wardecc bumper, Could shoot him in the face and get concorded anyway, could hire mercs,. so forth.
Did Miner take any proactive steps to solve his problem? Did Titan pilot take any proactive steps to solve his problem?
Could Miner take any proactive steps to solve his problem? Could Titan pilot take any proactive steps to solve his problem? |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
99
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Nerf Burger wrote: Can't blame ya man. EVE is still a joke with regards on how it deals with high sec "pirates". Maybe CCP will pull their head out of their ass one day.
CCP have no need to do anything of the sort, they're not in that particular predicament. Speaking heads and arses, hows the view from there?
I feel the need to introduce NB to the pot. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
100
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:
Big Fat DERP.
yea, tell that to my friends who I can't get to play EVE because none of them wants to ever be at the mercy of cowardly douchebags who take no risks and pay no real consequences for failure or success. I guess CCP didn't want their money anyway. They would rather keep cowardly grief monkeys who are afraid of challenge happy? Like I said, hopefully CCP will pull their head out of their ass one of these days. so many nonsensical clowns.
Then man the **** up and do something that isn't moaning that isn't moaning that isn't moaning that isn't moaning that isn't moaning |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
100
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
They're not valid cmplaints though, thats what my beef lies with.
If you and your friends aren't interested in standing up for yourselves why are you here? You have access to everything everyone else does, your steadfast stance on doing absolutely nothing proactive about the situation and demanding that someone else do it for you is laughable.
Shall i go farm some sleepers for you to go pay for whatever you lost in time being bumped?
If the reason you want things to be changed is because you don't want to do anything for yourself you really don't belong here. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
100
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:They're not valid cmplaints though, thats what my beef lies with.
If you and your friends aren't interested in standing up for yourselves why are you here? it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, you ridiculous clown. It is the fact that high sec "pirates" can't really be punished and take no risks and sometimes people just want to pve and not be ****** with. You have serious reading comprehension issues you need to work out before you reply in this thread any further.
Punished for what?
You want them punished for something you don't like. They take risks by playing the game in a way that inflames other players such as yourself.
Thing is you don't do anything about it.
Nerf Burger wrote: it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, How does it have nothing to do with not standing up for yourself? That mean old kid pushed you, and pushed you, and pushed you. You know spaceships have guns, try sticking one to him.
You are in EvE a MMO you don't have an option to PvE and not be messed with. That's not your desicion to make...
I have no problems in reading comprehension. You have a self entitled attitude is all.
If you approached this thread in a manner that you actually were looking at ways to fix your problems people would be more inclined to your "plight" (word used verrryyy loosely here.) |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
100
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Paranoid Loyd wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:They're not valid cmplaints though, thats what my beef lies with.
If you and your friends aren't interested in standing up for yourselves why are you here? it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, you ridiculous clown. It is the fact that high sec "pirates" can't really be punished and take no risks and sometimes people just want to pve and not be ****** with. You have serious reading comprehension issues you need to work out before you reply in this thread any further. So in essence, you want eve to be a single player game? I've got bad news, it's not.  not everything in a mmorpghas has to be done with a group of people, especially a game touted as a "sandbox". If you weren't a moron you would understand this.
Nowhere does it say anything that has to happen within the game, you crossed the line when you asked for restrictions on how some other people play.
Who says your playstyle is any more right than theirs? |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
109
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:49:00 -
[9] - Quote
Scarlett Wesson wrote:
They don't care about the fact that the mining mechanic encourages players to AFK to not die of boredom. The "AFKness", "non-tankiness" or whatnot of their victims is just an excuse to let their inner asshats take control without risk of getting their ass kicked like in RL. .
Is that not the sign of something being broken if the way you should play it is by NOT playing? |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
109
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:52:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
Why do you insist on this myth that there are two groups: Pro-solo players and Pro-Gankers to the exculsion of all else?
As neither a ganker nor a miner I can say you are wrong on this. Factually wrong.
I've never suggested there are only 'pro-solo' and 'pro-ganking' groups. I thought it was pretty clear. Pro-ganking, and anti-ganking. There really is only 2 sides to this, like most things. Either you are okay with ganking, or not. Clearly there are many on either side, with the advantage on the pro-ganking side. Which includes CCP, sadly. But that does not mean that things can change, as many gankers have already expressed frustration with (can flipping changes and the like). Eve's "harsh nature" won't be ruined by allowing people in highsec a little more protection against what we feel is anti-social bullying. I've said it many times before, and I'll keep saying it: I don't want 100% protection in highsec. Just make the decision to gank a much more serious one. I'll also add something I've not yet admitted. I have no sympathy for those who afk play, for any reason. I am very much opposed to botting. Heck, I don't even like multi-boxing, although I am seriously considering doing it myself to have a logi support my miner. The only point I have made ( and continue to make) is.... Why must CCP do your thinking for you? EVERY other profession in EvE requires thought to avoid catastrpophic loss. WHY must mining be a protected profession? The tools already exist to have a life free from the fear of small gang ganking, what more do you want?
Miners are endangered didn't you hear? We need to set up reserves for them to flourish and populate.
|
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
109
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote: Every other 'profession' except trading involves combat.
Please tell me more about how Exploring, Salvaging, Couriering, Researching, Noob Training, Manufacturing and Cynoalting involve combat please My apologies, I should have worded that from the other direction and clarified location. Allow me to re-state: Mining is the only in-space profession whose ships are meant to do something other than fight. In all but one of your in-space examples (courier), there will be fighting, and more importantly, the ship you will be in will be designed to fight. I admit to not knowing what a cyno-alt is, but my guess is a character serving only as a jump bridge for others. Even there, you will be in a ship designed for combat. Please, no one talk about how any equipment can be fit on any ship if it's the right slot! I would have to ask why you don't take an Orca into fleet warfare. Or a Hulk to assault a POS.....
Also for the record, every man and dog in a WH uses an orca in PvP  |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
109
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 19:02:00 -
[12] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I have to quibble with the statement that "highsec is where the pvp is". First, a mendacious point hashed over plenty the past few days: ganking is not PvP, as the aggression and threat is from one side only. Ganking is the knock-out game.
You want us PvP in a fight not to our advantage?
Do tell me why on earth i would like to risk my 2.5b isk machariel against your 15 man fleet.
Cause then you would not be fighting "fair" PvP. The term "fair" is relative and is really silly to throw around. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
109
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 20:09:00 -
[13] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
And thus the question sir. If the only goal is NOT 100% safe then what IS the goal? At what point, and to what extent, does high-sec need to be made safe. You see I am looking for a goal post here. I want someone to tell me HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH and then stick to that. I'd offer a suggestion. What if Concord response time was a multiplier of the security status? 1.0 means arrival nearly immediately. 0.5 means Concord arrives as fast as it does now. Then extrapolate for the other numbers.
Because this make nothing safer at all... this idea will only change profit margins and losses for gankers. there is no effect on safety. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
114
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 23:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
I think this stems from the fallacy that high sec is actually "safe" at all. This attitude needs to be looked at.  |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
125
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:45:00 -
[15] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Bobby Frutt wrote: Lotta smart things
It seems to me, Proactive is not in a miners vocabulary, Deep Core Mining must be short of dictionaries.
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
137
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 00:55:00 -
[16] - Quote
But isk per hr...
THINK ABOUT THE ISK
WE WANT A GREATER FUTURE FOR OUR ISK PER HOURS!!! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
137
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:13:00 -
[17] - Quote
Wasnt that movie a piece of trash? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
138
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:20:00 -
[18] - Quote
Because all these forum newbs are already told bad things from day 1 in their npc corp  Best not put them to bad films as well https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
139
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:29:00 -
[19] - Quote
The book is really good, i have it sitting here, i got it on sale last christmas as it was about spaceships and was in their "top 100 lists"
I'll sponsor a carebear by taking them into a wormhole and showing them the wonders of the universe, the birds and the bees, and more  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
140
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:36:00 -
[20] - Quote
I swear to god if there aren't cookies this time im going to throw the milk in his face... You can't lead me on and string me along. its pure heartbreak  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
140
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:44:00 -
[21] - Quote
:l we dont have doors... only wobbly holes, which by the way don't really stop people who want to go through them.
And they just don't go away. Worse than herpes i tell you, as soon as you think its gone it pops up in another place... https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
140
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:52:00 -
[22] - Quote
I wonder what the average attention span of a bear is and if it relates to the real world problems we all face https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:03:00 -
[23] - Quote
We are doing this for future generations, so our children may live in a land free of Concord and Empires. Free of tyranny and those faceless corporations sucking isk from the honest bounty hunter.
Where a man can say NAY! This is my space and i shall defend it and myself to the fullest of my abilities!
Where strength is what characters are judged by instead of the amount of begging they throw at the feet of our overlords.
...
I'll grab my tranquilizer gun and safari hat. 
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:05:00 -
[24] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:I wonder what the average attention span of a bear is and if it relates to the real world problems we all face
"Bears seem to have very short attention spans and if they are responding to a call and the sound stops, generally the bear will cease following the sound" Real world problems like ISK/hr?
We don't have problems with aquirinh isk so the rate does not matter 
Real problems are more like how to avoid suprise butsecks gangs <3 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:09:00 -
[25] - Quote
Did you hear about all the people just abandoning their Fedos over the christmas period?
Do people not even have a heart to spare a thought for these poor little creatures...  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:14:00 -
[26] - Quote
Guess we all gotta give a little some time eh? Can't always be on top heh https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
143
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:22:00 -
[27] - Quote
Actually where was the last afk stealth thread? or even drone assist thread? I don't remember seeing a single grr goons post today either.
What the hell is going on with GD today? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
143
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:30:00 -
[28] - Quote
Oh true, that counts as cloaking. So i guess we're not completely borked for the day https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
144
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:51:00 -
[29] - Quote
I don't know why people assosicate purple with grape flavour. seems wrong to me. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
154
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 19:26:00 -
[30] - Quote
Learning never killed anyone  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
154
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 19:33:00 -
[31] - Quote
I would love to be able to drink myself drunk then right back sober, that would be bloody amazing  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
155
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 21:13:00 -
[32] - Quote
Have you seen the undock of Jita? thats a pretty good reason for bumping to not damage ships haha Also in regards to flagging how do you determine who "agressed" who? Does it invoke a concord response for agression? Is it a way to kill people in high sec without concord response?
Also regarding death, as per lore our conciousness is instantly transmitted to some bio blob in a station so that we can keep playing and dying :D https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
155
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 21:25:00 -
[33] - Quote
Oh i'll set up a fraps cloaked about 80-90 km away cloaked with the camera beelined to the undock and watch the pretty fireworks. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
156
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 22:13:00 -
[34] - Quote
Well selling respawn timers is bad, war z dayz infestation whatever bad game....
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
164
|
Posted - 2014.01.14 23:41:00 -
[35] - Quote
She should have had a neutral scout with her https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
166
|
Posted - 2014.01.15 21:34:00 -
[36] - Quote
Or he you know, could be not terrible a tthe game. Is that an option?  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |
|
|
|